Alarming News

June 30, 2008

Bill Clinton is all class

And he’s not ready to make nice with Obama:

“He’s saying he’s not going to reach out, that Obama has to come to him. One person told me that Bill said Obama would have to quote kiss my ass close quote, if he wants his support.

UPDATE: Obama and Bill Clinton finally speak

Posted by Karol at 11:24 AM |
Technorati Tags:

Bill Clinton: the gift that keeps on giving.

Posted by: Snoop Diggity-DANG-Dawg at June 30, 2008 at 11:38 am

Hey, it coulda been worse for Barack. Remember that Monica did stuff to Bill’s other side.

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at June 30, 2008 at 11:41 am

Why should Clinton reach out to Obama? Bill is a retired two-term president whereas Obama is only a half-term junior senator. Bill doesn’t need Obama at all.

Posted by: Marco at June 30, 2008 at 11:53 am

Marco has a great point. If Obama isn’t choose Hillary, why should Bill bother?

Posted by: Ari at June 30, 2008 at 12:18 pm

oops – “choosing”. (it’s Monday – enough said)

Posted by: Ari at June 30, 2008 at 12:19 pm

well it matters because it provides more evidence that he is really only concerned with the Democratic Party in so far as it is a means to an ends. Not because he truly believes the message.
Although from my POV, it makes little difference whether one is supporting a collectivist message only to gain personal power or if one truly believes in collectivism. There are differences between the two, but both are bad in their own ways.

Posted by: E5 at June 30, 2008 at 1:19 pm

Oh… see, I didn’t realize Obama had a message.

Posted by: Ari at June 30, 2008 at 2:21 pm

Change…action…some other shit I don’t remember, but saw on a yuppie’s handbag whilst riding the D train last week.
Oh yeah, “hope,” that’s it.

Posted by: Gerard at June 30, 2008 at 3:41 pm

well I’m referring more to the democratic/collectivist party in general.
If one truly believes in the cause, after all the bickering about who gets to lead the party, they would still support the cause itself.
If one is merely an opportunist, they would only support the cause if they get to lead it.
so yeah… the Clintons are opportunist and don’t really give a shit about the Democratic party – not really news. Not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing, though.
If it were unveiled that Che was “only in it for the chicks” would that make his murdering spree worse, or better or just different?

Posted by: E5 at June 30, 2008 at 3:46 pm

Not necessarily.
See, you’re all about the forced collectivization, party-imposed groupthink and selfless devotion to the fatherland. Then you realize someone else wants to be the head Bolshie and it’s time to break out the icepicks and intraparty show-trials.

Posted by: Gerard at June 30, 2008 at 4:01 pm

I can safely say I am a consistent anarcho-capitalist.
I support the cause regardless of who doesn’t get to not be in charge of a gov’t that doesn’t exist.

Posted by: E5 at June 30, 2008 at 4:06 pm
Post a comment