You know behind the ear is the first thing you see on someone passed out in a ditch, right? But the space above the left breast? Tucked safely in the mud…

Don’t these chicks realize that when they’re 65, they’re going to look horrible with tattoos of rattlesnakes, dragons, and “Jimmy forever,” “Bobby forever,” all over their body ?
Can you picture an aging Lauren Bacall with sleeves…or Liz Taylor with the names of all of her husbands on her breasts ?
She’d have to get additional breasts implanted to make space !

Old is old. We’re all going to think we look like shit, whether we got pictures on our bodies or no.

She must have a really nice voice, since she already kind of looks like shit.
And the tattoo thing is no big deal – you can get them lased off, though I hear it smarts a bit.

Shawn Macomber wrote;
“Old is old. We’re all going to think we look like shit, whether we got pictures on our bodies or no.”
——–
——
I disagree.
Not everyone ages the same, and a lot of that has to do with lifestyle choices.
Lauren Bacall and Eva Marie Saint are old, but they look elegant. They wouldn’t look elegant if they had a bunch of visible tattoos.

Old is old. We’re all going to think we look like shit, whether we got pictures on our bodies or no.
Bull’s-eye.
Bacall could refashion herself into a Maori tribesman and she would still look like death warmed-over.

I agree with BB, Bacall is star quality whatever her age.
Amy Winehouse can’t be that well off, she turns up at her gigs drunk, and then cries and then leaves. Punters ask for their money back.
Although I love the Zuton’s original, Winehouse does a great cover on Mark Ronson’s version of ‘Valerie’. Ronson has also done a version of The Smiths ‘Stop me’, but I’m not so fashed.

[...] It’s a Christmas miracle!  I think they just figured out that removing or changing their matching tattoos would be too complicated. Posted by Karol at 04:28 PM | Comments Post a [...]